McDonnell Douglas Corporation — Corporate Overview
Premises Description
McDonnell Aircraft Corporation (founded 1939 by James S. McDonnell; merged with Douglas Aircraft Company in 1967 to form McDonnell Douglas Corporation; merged with Boeing 1997, today operated as a Boeing division; historically headquartered in St. Louis Missouri) operated through the 20th century the McDonnell / McDonnell Douglas St. Louis MO aerospace and defense manufacturing complex — adjacent to Lambert-St. Louis International Airport — and additional U.S. plants across the McDonnell Douglas Douglas-legacy network. The St. Louis complex was the principal U.S. manufacturing site for the F-4 Phantom II, F-15 Eagle, F/A-18 Hornet, AV-8 Harrier, Mercury and Gemini spacecraft, and numerous military aerospace and defense programs throughout the asbestos era.
Plaintiffs alleged in publicly filed U.S. asbestos personal-injury and wrongful-death litigation that McDonnell Douglas — as premises owner — exposed its aerospace machinist workforce (UAW / International Association of Machinists representation) and contractor pipefitters, insulators, boilermakers, and trade workers at the St. Louis complex and across the Douglas-legacy U.S. plant network to extensive asbestos:
- Asbestos pipe covering on plant steam mains, hot-oil and process piping
- Asbestos block insulation on boilers and heat exchangers
- Asbestos refractory in heat-treat furnaces and metal-processing equipment
- Asbestos gaskets and packing at process flanges, valves, and pumps
- Asbestos electrical insulation on plant motor and switchgear systems
- Asbestos fireproofing on plant structural steel and aircraft-hangar steel
- Asbestos protective garments for hot-work and welding operations
- Asbestos-containing aircraft components during assembly and rework (brake friction, gaskets, electrical wiring insulation — separately addressed in component-manufacturer defendant pages)
McDonnell Douglas Corporation has been named as a Premises Defendant in publicly filed U.S. asbestos personal-injury and wrongful-death litigation — including in cases venued in St. Louis MO courts where the company’s principal manufacturing complex was located.
Workers Exposed
- IAM / UAW Local members at McDonnell Douglas St. Louis MO complex
- Pipefitters (UA Local 562 St. Louis members) working McDonnell Douglas capital projects
- Insulators (HFIAW Local 1 St. Louis members) dispatched to McDonnell Douglas
- Boilermakers (IBB Local 27 St. Louis members) at McDonnell Douglas
- Electricians (IBEW Local 1 St. Louis members) working McDonnell Douglas plant electrical systems
- Construction-trade workforces on McDonnell Douglas capital projects
If You Worked at McDonnell Douglas St. Louis
If you worked at the McDonnell Aircraft / McDonnell Douglas / Boeing St. Louis MO complex or any other McDonnell Douglas U.S. aerospace facility during the asbestos era — as a McDonnell Douglas employee or as a dispatched contractor trade worker — and have since been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, lung cancer, or another asbestos-related illness, you may have legal rights.
Free, confidential case evaluation: Speak with O’Brien Law Firm — (314) 207-2823
Related
Plants by State
McDonnell Douglas Corporation operated plants across multiple U.S. states. Detailed premises information is available on the following state jobsite pages:
Related
Documented in Public Court Records
According to publicly filed federal asbestos litigation records (reviewed via CourtListener/RECAP), Mcdonnell Douglas has been named in 300+ documented asbestos dockets filed between 2005 and 2024 — concentrated in the federal asbestos multidistrict litigation (In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, MDL 875, E.D. Pennsylvania) and other U.S. district courts.
In these publicly filed cases, Mcdonnell Douglas is most often named alongside other companies frequently sued as co-defendants in the same asbestos actions, including General Electric, Honeywell International, United Technologies, IMO Industries, Union Carbide, Lockheed Martin, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber, Eaton.
Case counts and co-defendant associations are drawn from publicly filed litigation records and reflect allegations, not findings of liability, which is determined case by case.